Comments on: Blog Traffic Quality http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/ Just another WordPress site Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:14:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mel Melhado@Naples real estate http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-8341 Mel Melhado@Naples real estate Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:29:45 +0000 http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-8341 I'll have to say that you're correct! Most Social bookmarking sites don't give you good traffic despite the fact that you have a good article that has great points and that are valuable. You have to pick your social bookmarking sites wisely. As mentioned about, Reddit and Digg are good ones. I’ll have to say that you’re correct! Most Social bookmarking sites don’t give you good traffic despite the fact that you have a good article that has great points and that are valuable. You have to pick your social bookmarking sites wisely. As mentioned about, Reddit and Digg are good ones.

]]> By: Robert@ Free Ebook Blog http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-527 Robert@ Free Ebook Blog Sun, 17 May 2009 18:27:44 +0000 http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-527 Posting on blogs in the same niche not only provide you targeted traffic, but is also a good link building which help your site to increase in SERP and get more traffic from search engines. Posting on blogs in the same niche not only provide you targeted traffic, but is also a good link building which help your site to increase in SERP and get more traffic from search engines.

]]> By: Paul from Bebo http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-526 Paul from Bebo Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:04:18 +0000 http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-526 well we just have to wait and test it. well we just have to wait and test it.

]]> By: Tadeusz Szewczyk http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-525 Tadeusz Szewczyk Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:40:36 +0000 http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-525 I totally, completely and fully agree ;-) Large social news sites like Digg and Reddit will crash your server probably but the users won't be of much use, that's why I wrote http://seo2.0.onreact.com/10-reasons-not-to-use-digg In contrast, small topic oriented social news like DZone (programming), Designfloat (design) or Sphinn (SEO) will bring you qualified traffic. I totally, completely and fully agree ;-)
Large social news sites like Digg and Reddit will crash your server probably but the users won’t be of much use, that’s why I wrote http://seo2.0.onreact.com/10-reasons-not-to-use-digg

In contrast, small topic oriented social news like DZone (programming), Designfloat (design) or Sphinn (SEO) will bring you qualified traffic.

]]> By: Simon http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-524 Simon Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:22:33 +0000 http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-524 @ moneymaker - Yeah I bet your right there. Well I think that search traffic would be more likely to click on an ad, but maybe not as likely to leave a comment or subscribe to your feed. But good traffic to get. Cheers. @ moneymaker – Yeah I bet your right there. Well I think that search traffic would be more likely to click on an ad, but maybe not as likely to leave a comment or subscribe to your feed. But good traffic to get. Cheers.

]]> By: moneymaker http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-523 moneymaker Fri, 10 Aug 2007 05:19:23 +0000 http://www.pingable.org/blog-traffic-quality/#comment-523 natural search brings the best conversion base on my experience... natural search brings the best conversion base on my experience…

]]>