18
Nov

Technorati Top 20 Validation Woes – Who Has The Most Errors?

Written by Simon Ward. Posted in Web Design

How important is XHTML validation? Only one of the top 20 blogs on the Internet validated without errors, with another topping out with a total of 630 validation errors. So is validation important. I think most of these A-list blogger’s would have you believe it isn’t. Check out the list:

Technorati Top 20

Rank Blog XHTML Validation
1 WordPress Development Blog Passed validation
2 Arstechnica Failed validation, 22 Errors
3 Lifehacker Failed validation, 42 Errors
4 Gizmodo Failed validation, 84 Errors
5 Perez Hilton Failed validation, 99 Errors
6 Seth Godin Failed validation, 113 Errors
7 Tree Hugger Failed validation, 139 Errors
8 Engadget Failed validation, 166 Errors
9 Readwriteweb Failed validation, 178 Errors
10 Mashable Failed validation, 178 Errors
11 icanhascheezburger Failed validation, 228 Errors
12 Problogger Failed validation, 284 Errors
13 TechCrunch Failed validation, 288 Errors
14 TMZ Failed validation, 298 Errors
15 Post Secret Failed validation, 310 Errors
16 Huffingtonpost Failed validation, 328 Errors
17 Official Google Blog Failed validation, 329 Errors
18 Daily Kos Failed validation, 397 Errors
19 Boingboing Failed validation, 437 Errors
20 Blog di Beppe Grillo Failed validation, 630 Errors

The main reason validation is important is that Non-valid pages are relying on error-correction by a browser to display the page correctly, this will vary depending on the browser. I guess I share the sediments of most people on this topic, if the Official Google blog doesn’t validate, why should I care if mine doesn’t. There are many things  that can cause errors, such as scripts, plug-ins and widgets. I feel as a blogger you need to weigh the value that these bring versus the value you loss by not having a valid XHTML page. Other validations issues such as not setting alt text for images are less forgivable and should be followed. What do you think?

www.pingable.org

Tags: ,

Trackback from your site.





Simon Ward

I created pingable back in 2007. Still loving blogging about Wordpress. Read more Connect with me via my Google Plus.

Comments (13)

  • November 18, 2007 at 1:32 pm |

    great list — validation is important for user’s point of view to have them trust in the system.

  • November 18, 2007 at 4:04 pm |

    It’s really not that hard to have a validated blog. Sometimes mistakes slip through and a few errors are okay. But 300?

    I lose respect for designers who don’t care enough to validate. Whenever I update or tweak a layout, I run a few pages through XHTML and CSS validators and make sure everything’s correct. To me, coding is important. I’d rather someone’s website be valid and look off in IE than it look perfect in the devil’s browser and have 300 errors.

    By the way, Pingable.org has 274 errors.

  • November 18, 2007 at 11:00 pm |

    lol. Probably mine is just as bad but then again its not a leading blog. At least not yet ;-)

  • November 19, 2007 at 1:28 am |

    @ Sydney: I am well aware of the poor validation on Pingable, that’s what gave me the idea for the article, I decided to write the article instead of spending time fixing validation issues. It’s poor, but I really don’t have the time right now, at least I am in good company!

  • November 19, 2007 at 10:49 am |

    It’s funny that even Google doesn’t care! It’s an interesting list nonetheless.

  • November 19, 2007 at 12:42 pm |

    I went through your source and most of your errors are very easily fixable. A whole bunch of them will disappear if you simply take out one tag that wasn’t necessary and wasn’t closed.

    Would you like me to clean up your coding for you?

  • November 19, 2007 at 12:46 pm |

    Thanks for the offer Sydney, I am actually in the process of having a new theme designed for this blog. I won one of the pro blogger birthday bash competitions, so that’s the main reason I haven’t bothered fixing the validation errors. Thanks for the very kind offer though :)

  • November 19, 2007 at 6:45 pm |

    I think validation is important to a degree. I validate the major pages of my site, but the blog I haven’t really worried about in the past. It’s hard to believe that some of these sites could have this many errors.

  • November 20, 2007 at 3:49 am |

    I find it’s easy to have your site validate when you launch, but after blogging for a while and throwing stuff up there when you’re in a hurry, it can get messy. WYSIWYG editors like TinyMCE often let invalid code sneak in there, especially if the person using it is a complete novice.

  • November 20, 2007 at 6:45 pm |

    Hahaha… I got 11 errors, mostly because there were IE hacks which firefox can’t read.

  • November 27, 2007 at 8:48 pm |

    Pingable? Nice blog name. :)

  • January 13, 2008 at 7:32 pm |

    From our experience validation is very important it help us a lot with our SEO efforts

  • manu from Hostels Sydney
    October 31, 2009 at 12:02 am |

    I really say thanks for your great comparison task.Its very helpful for me.thanks for posting it above.

Leave a comment

This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.

Pingable Facebook

Pingable Archive