<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati Top 20 Validation Woes &#8211; Who Has The Most Errors?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:14:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: manu@Hostels Sydney</title>
		<link>http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>manu@Hostels Sydney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1928</guid>
		<description>I really say thanks for your great comparison task.Its very helpful for me.thanks for posting it above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really say thanks for your great comparison task.Its very helpful for me.thanks for posting it above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web design new york</title>
		<link>http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1927</link>
		<dc:creator>web design new york</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1927</guid>
		<description>From our experience validation is very important it help us a lot with our SEO efforts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From our experience validation is very important it help us a lot with our SEO efforts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCNA Exploration</title>
		<link>http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator>CCNA Exploration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 03:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1926</guid>
		<description>Pingable?  Nice blog name. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pingable?  Nice blog name. <img src='http://www.pingable.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firewalker</title>
		<link>http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1925</link>
		<dc:creator>Firewalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1925</guid>
		<description>Hahaha... I got 11 errors, mostly because there were IE hacks which firefox can&#039;t read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha&#8230; I got 11 errors, mostly because there were IE hacks which firefox can&#8217;t read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall Doherty</title>
		<link>http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall Doherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>I find it&#039;s easy to have your site validate when you launch, but after blogging for a while and throwing stuff up there when you&#039;re in a hurry, it can get messy. WYSIWYG editors like TinyMCE often let invalid code sneak in there, especially if the person using it is a complete novice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it&#8217;s easy to have your site validate when you launch, but after blogging for a while and throwing stuff up there when you&#8217;re in a hurry, it can get messy. WYSIWYG editors like TinyMCE often let invalid code sneak in there, especially if the person using it is a complete novice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Snell</title>
		<link>http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>I think validation is important to a degree. I validate the major pages of my site, but the blog I haven&#039;t really worried about in the past. It&#039;s hard to believe that some of these sites could have this many errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think validation is important to a degree. I validate the major pages of my site, but the blog I haven&#8217;t really worried about in the past. It&#8217;s hard to believe that some of these sites could have this many errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the offer Sydney, I am actually in the process of having a new theme designed for this blog. I won one of the pro blogger birthday bash competitions, so that&#039;s the main reason I haven&#039;t bothered fixing the validation errors. Thanks for the very kind offer though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the offer Sydney, I am actually in the process of having a new theme designed for this blog. I won one of the pro blogger birthday bash competitions, so that&#8217;s the main reason I haven&#8217;t bothered fixing the validation errors. Thanks for the very kind offer though <img src='http://www.pingable.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sydney</title>
		<link>http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1921</link>
		<dc:creator>Sydney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1921</guid>
		<description>I went through your source and most of your errors are very easily fixable. A whole bunch of them will disappear if you simply take out one  tag that wasn&#039;t necessary and wasn&#039;t closed.

Would you like me to clean up your coding for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went through your source and most of your errors are very easily fixable. A whole bunch of them will disappear if you simply take out one  tag that wasn&#8217;t necessary and wasn&#8217;t closed.</p>
<p>Would you like me to clean up your coding for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Cardozo</title>
		<link>http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1920</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Cardozo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1920</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny that even Google doesn&#039;t care!  It&#039;s an interesting list nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that even Google doesn&#8217;t care!  It&#8217;s an interesting list nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pingable.org/technorati-top-20-validation-woes/#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>@ Sydney: I am well aware of the poor validation on Pingable, that&#039;s what gave me the idea for the article, I decided to write the article instead of spending time fixing validation issues. It&#039;s poor, but I really don&#039;t have the time right now, at least I am in good company!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Sydney: I am well aware of the poor validation on Pingable, that&#8217;s what gave me the idea for the article, I decided to write the article instead of spending time fixing validation issues. It&#8217;s poor, but I really don&#8217;t have the time right now, at least I am in good company!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

